I know that I can just use the slower rated cards but me likes to know why this is required because would seem to me that if these speeds like 120mb/s are Maximums that they would be backwards compatible and work with the camera while seems to me that it would be the 30 & 90 mb/s that would be having the problems. The only area where exFAT loses to FAT32 is compatibility. FAT32 cant handle partitions larger than 8TB, or files larger than 4GB, whereas exFAT can handle files and partitions up to 128 petabytes, which is 128,000 terabytes. Its as if for some reason these cameras do not like and will not function correctly with cards that are faster than 90mb/s. exFAT is the successor to FAT32, and addresses FAT32s biggest limitations: file and drive sizes. I also have some Sandisk Ultra 30mb/s circle 10 cards which work just fine in every Browning camera that I have. The 120mb/s is an ImageMate with 1 in U and 10 in circle. The 90mb/s is an extreme with 3 in U and 10 in circle. Enter 'clean' and press Enter to run the cleaning utility. Enter 'select disk 2' (make sure to replace the number with the drive number of the SanDisk SD card). The imaging process will overwrite any formatting you have done on the SD card. The rest of the SD card will be formatted in a Linux format (EXT4 currently). It needs to be in FAT format to be universally recognised. Then enter 'list disk' to list the available drives on the computer. The boot partition needed on the SD card is tiny. All cards are being formatted as FAT32 per Browning's recommendations and are then having the Browning's DELETED ALL function ran against them to eliminate any existing data/videos from them, again this is per Browning's recommendations.īoth cards are Sandisk and both are 32gb size and both are SDHC. Launch the command prompt by pressing both Windows and R buttons. 1 Hi, I got a brand new USB 3.0 Sandisk 128GB flash drive which I formatted to FAT32 (so my PS3 could read it) and when I transfer video files to it (plugged in to USB 3.0 slot) the speeds are. Nothing wrong with the SD card because it functions fine on my desktop and laptop computers.ĭon't think there is anything defective about the cards because works fine with multiple slower 90mb/s cards and does NOT work with multiple 120mb/s cards. What I am ultimately trying to determine is WHY a trail camera would function fine when using a 90mb/s SD card but would NOT work with 100% (give bad file errors and lockup, in that, its menus would not function correctly and it can neither be turned on or off at times), when using a FASTER speed / 120mb/s SD card is placed in the camera. of the data going from the camera to the SD card, when the trail camera is recording a video onto the SD card ? In other words, does an SD card have a "controller" on it, similar to a convention/old style mechanical computer hard drive or is the flow of data to the SD card strictly the job/function of the hardware in the trail camera ? If an SD card is placed in say a hunting trail camera for the recording of video data, which device (the trail camera or the SD card) contains the "data controller" which determines the flow speed, etc.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |